company logo

Product

Our Product

We are Reshaping the way Developers find and fix vulnerabilities before they get exploited.

Solutions

By Industry

BFSI

Healthcare

Education

IT & Telecom

Government

By Role

CISO

Application Security Engineer

DevsecOps Engineer

IT Manager

Resources

Resource Library

Get actionable insight straight from our threat Intel lab to keep you informed about the ever-changing Threat landscape.

Subscribe to Our Weekly Threat Digest

Company

Contact Us

Have queries, feedback or prospects? Get in touch and we shall be with you shortly.

loading..
loading..
loading..
Loading...

Kansas City

MSP

Cyberattack

loading..
loading..
loading..

MyAppsAnywhere shut down following a cyberattack at NetStandard

A cyberattack on the US-managed service provider NetStandard caused the company to shut down its MyAppsAnywhere cloud services...

28-Jul-2022
3 min read

No content available.

Related Articles

loading..

Bluetooth

RCE

PerfektBlue vulnerabilities in OpenSynergy's BlueSDK enable one-click remote cod...

The discovery of four interconnected vulnerabilities in OpenSynergy's BlueSDK Bluetooth stack has exposed millions of vehicles from major manufacturers to potential remote code execution attacks. Dubbed "PerfektBlue" by researchers at [PCA Cyber Security](https://pcacybersecurity.com/), this exploit chain affects infotainment systems across Mercedes-Benz, Volkswagen, and Škoda vehicles, with implications extending far beyond the automotive sector. ## PerfektBlue Attack Chain The PerfektBlue attack leverages four distinct vulnerabilities that can be chained together to achieve remote code execution on target devices. The exploit requires minimal user interaction—often just accepting a Bluetooth pairing request—making it particularly dangerous for unsuspecting vehicle owners. ### Key Vulnerabilities Identified | CVE ID | Component | Severity | CVSS Score | Description | |--------|-----------|----------|------------|-------------| | CVE-2024-45434 | AVRCP | Critical | 8.0 | Use-After-Free vulnerability enabling RCE | | CVE-2024-45433 | RFCOMM | Medium | 5.7 | Incorrect function termination | | CVE-2024-45432 | RFCOMM | Medium | 5.7 | Function call with incorrect parameter | | CVE-2024-45431 | L2CAP | Low | 3.5 | Improper validation of remote channel ID | ## Widespread Impact Across Automotive Sector OpenSynergy's [BlueSDK](http://perfektblue.pcacybersecurity.com/) is extensively used in the automotive industry, making the vulnerability's reach substantial. Confirmed affected manufacturers include: - **Mercedes-Benz**: NTG6 and NTG7 infotainment systems - **Volkswagen**: ICAS3 systems in ID model series - **Škoda**: MIB3 head units in Superb model lines - **Unnamed OEM**: Additional manufacturer to be disclosed The researchers estimate that millions of vehicles manufactured between 2020-2025 contain vulnerable BlueSDK implementations, with potential exposure extending to mobile phones, industrial devices, and other embedded systems utilizing the framework. ## Technical Exploitation Details The PerfektBlue attack operates through a sophisticated multi-stage process: 1. **Initial Discovery**: Attacker identifies target vehicle's Bluetooth MAC address 2. **L2CAP Exploitation**: Weak parameter validation creates malicious connection state 3. **RFCOMM Memory Corruption**: Crafted packets trigger memory handling flaws 4. **AVRCP Code Execution**: Use-After-Free vulnerability enables shellcode injection 5. **System Compromise**: Full remote code execution under Bluetooth daemon privileges Once successful, attackers can access GPS coordinates, record audio, steal contact information, and potentially perform lateral movement to critical vehicle systems. ## Patch Distribution Challenges While OpenSynergy released patches to customers in September 2024, the complex automotive supply chain has delayed widespread deployment. The company confirmed receiving vulnerability reports in May 2024 and addressing the issues within four months. However, many vehicle manufacturers have yet to implement the fixes, leaving consumers vulnerable nearly ten months after patches became available. **Volkswagen** acknowledged the vulnerability, stating that exploitation requires specific conditions including proximity (5-7 meters), active pairing mode, and user approval. **Mercedes-Benz** has not provided public statements regarding patch deployment status. ## Industry Response and Mitigation The automotive industry's response has been mixed, highlighting ongoing challenges in cybersecurity coordination. Some manufacturers have begun over-the-air updates, while others require dealership visits for firmware updates. The incident underscores the critical importance of: - **Immediate firmware updates** for all affected vehicles - **Bluetooth security hardening** in infotainment systems - **Enhanced supply chain communication** between vendors and OEMs - **User awareness** regarding Bluetooth pairing practices ## Broader Implications for Connected Vehicles The PerfektBlue vulnerabilities represent a significant wake-up call for the automotive industry's approach to cybersecurity. As vehicles become increasingly connected, the attack surface expands beyond traditional automotive systems to include telecommunications, entertainment, and navigation components. The incident highlights the need for: - Rigorous security testing of third-party components - Faster patch deployment mechanisms - Enhanced isolation between infotainment and critical vehicle systems - Improved vulnerability disclosure processes ## Recommendations for Vehicle Owners Vehicle owners should take immediate action to protect against PerfektBlue attacks: - **Update infotainment firmware** through manufacturer OTA systems or dealership service - **Disable Bluetooth** when not actively needed - **Avoid pairing with unknown devices** in public areas - **Monitor manufacturer security advisories** for updates - **Consider professional security assessment** for high-value or fleet vehicles The PerfektBlue vulnerabilities expose a critical gap in automotive cybersecurity, demonstrating how widely-used third-party components can create industry-wide risks. While patches exist, the slow deployment highlights the need for more agile security response mechanisms in the automotive sector. As the industry continues its digital transformation, incidents like PerfektBlue serve as crucial reminders that cybersecurity must be prioritized throughout the entire supply chain, from component manufacturers to end-user vehicles. The automotive industry's response to PerfektBlue will likely influence future cybersecurity standards and practices, making this incident a pivotal moment in the evolution of connected vehicle security.

loading..   12-Jul-2025
loading..   4 min read
loading..

Aviation

Qantas faces a massive data breach exposing millions. Discover the latest update...

Qantas confirmed a major cyberattack that compromised the personal data of **5.7 million customers**. The breach was traced to a third-party platform used by Qantas’ Manila call centre, highlighting the risks inherent in global outsourcing and third-party data handling. This incident is not just a story of numbers, but a wake-up call for the aviation industry and its customers. ### What Was Stolen? Qantas’ forensic analysis revealed a nuanced picture of the breach, with the type and depth of data exposure varying significantly among customers: - **4 million customers**: Exposed data included tier names, email addresses, and Frequent Flyer details. - Of these, **1.2 million** records contained only a name and email address. - The remaining **2.8 million** included Frequent Flyer numbers, and in some cases, membership tier, points balance, or Status Credits. - **1.7 million customers**: Suffered a broader exposure, with combinations of the above and at least one of the following: - Residential or business address (**1.3 million**) - Date of birth (**1.1 million**) - Phone number (**900,000**) - Gender (**400,000**) - Meal preference (**10,000**) Notably, **no passwords, login details, or PINs** were compromised, and Qantas’ core systems remained unaffected. However, the exposed data is still highly valuable to scammers, especially for social engineering attacks. ### How the Breach Unfolded - The breach was linked to Qantas’ Manila call centre, but the airline operates call centres globally. Anyone who interacted with the Manila centre may be affected. - Qantas has been contacted by a “potential cybercriminal,” and the Australian Federal Police are involved to verify the legitimacy of this contact. - CEO Vanessa Hudson declined to comment on ransom demands, reflecting the sensitive and evolving nature of the incident. ### Customer Communication and Support - **Direct Notification**: From July 9, Qantas began emailing affected customers, specifying which data fields were compromised. This process is expected to be completed within 24 to 48 hours. - **Support Hotline**: Qantas established a 24/7 cyber support hotline, offering specialist identity protection advice. Interestingly, most hotline calls are routed to an overseas call centre in the UK, underscoring the global scale of the response. - **Compensation**: As of now, Qantas has not confirmed any compensation (such as Qantas Points or flight credits), but has not ruled it out. Customers are advised to monitor official communications for updates. ### Uncommon and Overlooked Angles #### 1. Third-Party Risk and Global Outsourcing The breach’s origin in a third-party Manila call centre platform exposes the vulnerabilities of global outsourcing. It raises questions about data sovereignty, oversight, and the security standards of international partners—issues that are often overlooked until a crisis emerges. #### 2. The Social Engineering Threat While no passwords were stolen, the combination of names, emails, addresses, and even meal preferences provides a rich toolkit for scammers. The risk is not just identity theft, but highly targeted phishing and social engineering attacks, where fraudsters can convincingly pose as Qantas staff. #### 3. Transparency and Real-Time Response Qantas’ approach—rapid forensic analysis, direct customer notification, and public updates—sets a new standard for transparency in the wake of a breach. The airline’s willingness to detail the types of data exposed, and its ongoing communication, may help rebuild trust, but also sets expectations for future incidents across the industry. #### 4. Ransom Dilemma The involvement of a “potential cybercriminal” and the refusal to comment on ransom demands highlight the complex decisions companies face in the aftermath of a breach. The interplay between law enforcement, corporate policy, and criminal actors remains a murky and evolving landscape. ### What’s Next? Security Measures and Customer Vigilance Qantas has implemented several new security measures: - Additional controls on Frequent Flyer accounts, including stricter identification for account changes. - Restricted access to the compromised third-party platform. - Enhanced system monitoring and detection for unusual activity. Customers are urged to remain vigilant, especially against scams leveraging the leaked data. Qantas recommends verifying the authenticity of emails (using DKIM and DMARC checks in Gmail) and never providing personal or payment details to unsolicited contacts—even if they appear legitimate. The Qantas data breach is a stark reminder that in a hyper-connected world, the weakest link can be anywhere in the global supply chain. The incident’s uncommon angles—third-party risk, the social engineering threat, and the transparency of Qantas’ response—offer critical lessons for businesses and consumers alike.

loading..   11-Jul-2025
loading..   4 min read
loading..

Social Engineering

M&S confirms a massive ransomware attack began with a social engineering breach,...

Marks & Spencer (M&S), one of the UK’s largest retailers, has confirmed that a sophisticated social engineering attack was the initial vector for a major ransomware incident in April 2025. The breach, attributed to the DragonForce ransomware group, resulted in the encryption of critical systems and the theft of approximately 150GB of sensitive data. The attack underscores the growing threat of impersonation tactics and the risks associated with third-party service providers. ## How the Attack Unfolded ### Sophisticated Impersonation - The breach began on April 17, 2025, when attackers impersonated an M&S employee to trick a third-party help desk into resetting a password. - The attackers used detailed personal information to convincingly pose as a legitimate staff member, a method described by M&S chairman Archie Norman as “sophisticated impersonation.” - The third-party involved was Tata Consultancy Services, which provides IT help desk support for M&S. Tata is believed to have been manipulated into resetting the password, granting attackers access to the M&S network. ### Entry to Ransomware Deployment - Once inside, the attackers deployed DragonForce ransomware, a group believed to operate out of Asia but distinct from the similarly named hacktivist group “DragonForce Malaysia.” - The attack was linked to threat actors associated with Scattered Spider, who have a history of leveraging social engineering for initial access. ## Impact and Response ### Double-Extortion Tactics - The ransomware encrypted numerous VMware ESXi servers, disrupting M&S operations. - Approximately 150GB of data was stolen, with the attackers threatening to publish the data if a ransom was not paid—a classic double-extortion approach. - M&S proactively shut down all systems to contain the attack, but the encryption and data theft had already occurred. ### Ransom Negotiations - M&S leadership decided not to engage directly with the attackers, instead relying on professional ransomware negotiators. - When questioned about ransom payments, M&S declined to provide details, citing public interest and ongoing cooperation with the National Crime Agency (NCA) and authorities. - As of the latest update, the stolen data has not appeared on DragonForce’s leak site, suggesting either a ransom was paid or negotiations are ongoing. ## Key Lessons and Security Implications ### Third-Party and Social Engineering Risks - The attack highlights the vulnerability of large organizations to social engineering, especially when third-party vendors are involved in critical support roles. - Even with advanced technical defenses, human factors and supply chain partners remain a significant risk vector. ### Ransomware Trends - DragonForce’s use of double-extortion tactics is now standard among major ransomware groups. - The incident demonstrates the importance of rapid response, professional negotiation, and transparent communication with authorities.

loading..   10-Jul-2025
loading..   3 min read