company logo

Product

Our Product

We are Reshaping the way Developers find and fix vulnerabilities before they get exploited.

Solutions

By Industry

BFSI

Healthcare

Education

IT & Telecom

Government

By Role

CISO

Application Security Engineer

DevsecOps Engineer

IT Manager

Resources

Resource Library

Get actionable insight straight from our threat Intel lab to keep you informed about the ever-changing Threat landscape.

Subscribe to Our Weekly Threat Digest

Company

Contact Us

Have queries, feedback or prospects? Get in touch and we shall be with you shortly.

loading..
loading..
loading..
Loading...

JavaScript

RAT

info-stealer

loading..
loading..
loading..

RATDispenser stealthily dodges detection to deploy keyloggers & info-stealers over the targeted systems

RATDispenser, newly discovered Javascript malware strain actively evades detection to deliver RATs, info-stealers, & keyloggers from 8 different malware familie...

24-Nov-2021
4 min read

No content available.

Related Articles

loading..

Teslamate

Over 1,300 TeslaMate servers exposed, leaking Tesla owners’ locations, trips, an...

In a sweeping internet scan, cybersecurity expert **Seyfullah Kiliç**, founder of SwordSec, uncovered **more than 1,300 publicly exposed TeslaMate dashboards**, inadvertently disclosing highly sensitive data including **precise vehicle locations**, charging history, and trip details. ### What Is TeslaMate — and Why Is This a Problem? TeslaMate is an open-source self-hosted data logger designed for Tesla owners. It visualizes metrics such as battery health, charging sessions, speed, temperature, and granular **location history**. Since TeslaMate is typically hosted on users’ own servers, misconfiguration—like leaving dashboards exposed to the internet without authentication—can unintentionally leak detailed vehicle data. ### How the Exposure Was Discovered Kiliç conducted a comprehensive scan across the internet, identifying open port 4000 servers and verifying TeslaMate signatures. He then scraped details such as vehicle last-seen locations and model names—and even visualized them on a map to illustrate just how exposed owners’ data were. > “You’re unintentionally sharing your car’s movements, charging habits, and even vacation times with the entire world.” — **Kiliç**, paraphrased This incident represents a significant escalation from 2022, when only dozens of TeslaMate dashboards were found exposed. It underscores a rapidly growing privacy gap. ### Recommendations from Security Experts Kiliç urged TeslaMate users to improve security immediately: * **Enable authentication** on TeslaMate dashboards. * Use **firewall rules** or **reverse proxies** to restrict inbound access. Even though a 2022 patch attempted to guard against accidental exposures, it ultimately cannot control individual users’ deployment practices. --- ### Why This Rewrite Offers Better SEO Results | Feature | Advantage | | -------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | **Clear Headline with Keywords** | Incorporates terms like “TeslaMate,” “vehicle data,” “exposed dashboards” for strong search rankings | | **Structured Sections** | Uses headings for better readability and SEO hierarchy (H2, H3) | | **Bullet Points & Quotes** | Improves scanning, engagement, and retains original sentiment | | **High-Relevance Keywords** | Terms like “self-hosted dashboards,” “GPS data leak,” “authentication” help with search intent matching | | **Internal Linking Potential** | Easy to link to related articles on vehicle privacy, open-source tools, or cybersecurity best practices |

loading..   26-Aug-2025
loading..   2 min read
loading..

Google Play

77 apps and 19M installs later Google’s Play Store faces a crisis as trust shatt...

Cybersecurity researchers revealed that **77 malicious Android apps** had slipped through Google Play’s defenses, amassing more than **19 million downloads** before being purged. Mainstream coverage framed the event predictably: cybercriminals struck, Google responded, and users should be cautious. Yet this narrative is incomplete—and dangerously misleading. The unpopular but essential truth is this: **Google Play is not primarily a sanctuary of trust. It is an ecosystem designed for growth, not safety.** Each new “malware purge” is not an anomaly, but a symptom of a business model that consistently leaves users exposed. ## Walled Garden Illusion For years, Google has marketed the Play Store as a **curated, safe environment**. Users are reassured by Play Protect scans and app review policies. But the persistence of long-known threats like the **Joker trojan**—responsible for nearly a quarter of the malicious apps in this incident—exposes a reality that doesn’t align with the marketing. * **Adware**, which dominated two-thirds of the rogue apps, isn’t even new or innovative. It is crude and detectable. * **Repeat offenders** like Joker prove that detection methods are reactive, not preventive. This is not a cat-and-mouse game where hackers are always one step ahead. It is a system that tolerates intrusions until bad press forces a purge. ## Users as Collateral Damage The most overlooked dimension is the user experience. Millions trusted the official marketplace, downloaded these apps, and unknowingly became test subjects in what amounts to a live experiment. * Victims were tricked into fraudulent subscriptions, saw their data harvested, or endured constant intrusive ads. * Non-technical users—especially those in developing markets—had little chance of spotting danger signals buried in permissions or reviews. * Ironically, Google’s advice always shifts responsibility to the user: “check reviews, be cautious.” But this contradicts the promise of a centralized, vetted app store. The result? **Users carry the burden of vigilance while Google retains the benefits of scale.** ## Economics of Insecurity Why does this cycle persist? Because the incentive structure works against real security. * For attackers, Google Play offers the **best ROI** in cybercrime: global reach, legitimacy by association, and minimal entry barriers. * For Google, every app—malicious or not—bolsters engagement metrics and platform growth. Malicious apps are outliers only when caught. * For users, the low-cost app economy hides its true cost: privacy, financial exploitation, and erosion of trust. This is the part no headline highlights: **Google and attackers both thrive on frictionless onboarding. Security comes second.** ## Invisible Victims Beyond financial loss, the true casualties of this incident are often ignored: * **Emerging markets**, where prepaid credit fraud can devastate users with limited resources. * **Low-literacy populations**, excluded from security best practices written for technically literate audiences. * **Independent developers**, whose legitimate apps face declining trust because the marketplace itself is tainted. Every malware purge isn’t just about malware. It’s about trust deficits that disproportionately harm the most vulnerable. ## Security Theater When Google announces a malware removal, it frames itself as decisive and vigilant. In reality, it’s **security theater**—a spectacle that reassures the public without addressing root causes. Questions rarely asked in mainstream coverage: * Why do legacy malware families keep resurfacing? * How long were these apps live before removal? * Why isn’t Google compensating users who suffered financial losses enabled by its marketplace? Until these questions are addressed, removal cycles will remain little more than **clean-up operations for self-created messes.** ## Beyond the Garden, Into the Dark Forest The removal of 77 malicious apps with 19 million downloads is not evidence of a system working. It is evidence of a system **designed to fail safely in public while succeeding quietly in metrics**. The unpopular but urgent narrative is this: **Google Play is not a walled garden. It is a dark forest—where predators thrive, users wander blindly, and safety depends less on protections than on luck.** Until Google reimagines its marketplace as public infrastructure, not just an ad funnel, the next purge is not just likely—it is inevitable.

loading..   25-Aug-2025
loading..   4 min read
loading..

Inotiv

Qilin

Pharmaceutical research company Inotiv faces operational disruptions and data th...

Inotiv, Inc., a prominent contract research organization specializing in drug discovery and development, fell victim to a sophisticated ransomware attack that encrypted critical systems and exfiltrated sensitive data. The **Qilin ransomware group** (also known as Agenda) claimed responsibility, alleging that they stole approximately 176 GB of data—equivalent to roughly 162,000 files—including financial records, research contracts, and employee information. The attack disrupted business operations, forcing the company to transition to offline alternatives while initiating forensic investigations and engaging law enforcement. This incident highlights the escalating threat that ransomware poses to the pharmaceutical and healthcare research sectors, where data sensitivity and operational continuity are of paramount importance. ## Background on Inotiv Inotiv is a **Indiana-based contract research organization** (CRO) employing around **2,000 specialists** and generating over **$500 million in annual revenue** . The company provides critical services in drug development, drug discovery, safety assessment, and live animal research modeling for pharmaceutical and biotechnology clients. Its work often involves **years-long nonclinical studies** and early-stage research, making data integrity and confidentiality essential not only for commercial success but also for regulatory compliance and public health advancements . As a key player in the pharmaceutical research ecosystem, Inotiv handles sensitive intellectual property, proprietary research data, and confidential client information, making it an attractive target for cybercriminals. ## Ransomware Attack ### Timeline and Initial Response Inotiv detected the cybersecurity incident on **August 8, 2025**, and immediately took steps to contain the breach. According to an **SEC 8-K filing** submitted by Chief Financial Officer Beth A. Taylor, the company launched an investigation with the help of external cybersecurity experts, restricted access to certain systems, and notified law enforcement authorities . The preliminary investigation revealed that a threat actor had gained unauthorized access to and encrypted portions of Inotiv's systems, temporarily impacting access to internal data storage and business applications. ### Operational Impact and Mitigation Strategies The encryption of systems led to significant **disruptions in business operations**, affecting databases and applications essential for daily processes. To mitigate the impact, Inotiv activated its business continuity strategy, transitioning some operations to offline alternatives. Despite these efforts, the company acknowledged that disruptions are expected to persist for some time, and no timeline for full restoration has been provided. The attack highlights the vulnerability of centralized data repositories in pharmaceutical research, where decades of valuable information can be compromised in a single breach. ## Qilin Connection ### Group Profile and Tactics The **Qilin ransomware gang**—a **Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS)** operation—publicly claimed responsibility for the attack on **August 11**, listing Inotiv on its leak site and publishing samples of the allegedly stolen data as proof . Qilin has evolved into a highly sophisticated threat group, leveraging customizable malware variants written in Rust and Go to target Windows, Linux, and VMware ESXi environments . Notably, Qilin systematically exploits critical vulnerabilities in **Fortinet products** (CVE-2024-21762 and CVE-2024-55591) to gain initial access, escalate privileges, and penetrate victim networks . In Q2 2025, Qilin accounted for **19% of ransomware incidents** impacting industrial organizations, reflecting its aggressive recruitment of skilled affiliates and alignment with state-sponsored threats . ### Extortion Demands Qilin alleges to have exfiltrated **176 GB of data**, including: - Financial records - Research contracts - Purchase orders - Employee information. This data theft aligns with the group's **double-extortion strategy**, where stolen data is leveraged to pressure victims into paying ransoms by threatening public leakage. The publication of sample documents on Qilin's leak site suggests the claims are credible, though Inotiv has not yet confirmed the extent of the data breach . ## Impact on Operations and Stakeholders ### Research and Development Delays The attack has **disrupted critical research activities**, potentially delaying ongoing drug development projects and nonclinical studies. For pharmaceutical research organizations like Inotiv, such disruptions can have **cascading effects** on client projects, regulatory submissions, and overall business continuity. The loss or compromise of long-term research data could necessitate years of redundant work, amplifying financial and operational costs. ### Regulatory and Compliance Exposure Inotiv may face **regulatory scrutiny** under HIPAA, GDPR, and FDA regulations, particularly if stolen data includes sensitive client or patient information. The company's SEC filing emphasizes that the full scope and impacts—including financial and operational consequences—remain under investigation. This incident also highlights the implications of the **SEC's new cybersecurity disclosure rules**, which require public companies to report material cyber incidents within four days . ### Reputational and Client Trust Risks The breach could erode trust among clients, partners, and investors, especially given the sensitive nature of pharmaceutical research. Inotiv has already faced unrelated enforcement actions earlier in 2025, and this cyber incident introduces **additional reputational risks** during a critical period. Clients may reconsider their reliance on centralized data storage models, opting for more segmented and secure architectures. ## Expert Commentary ### Industry Voices on ransomware Threats **Rebecca Moody, Head of Data Research at Comparitech**, notes that attacks on healthcare-related companies like Inotiv have **far-reaching consequences** due to their access to vast datasets across multiple entities . She confirmed that 19 similar attacks have occurred globally in 2025, resulting in over 6 million records breached. **Ensar Seker, Chief Information Security Officer at SOCRadar**, emphasized that the encryption of key systems and theft of proprietary research data places both **operational continuity and intellectual property at grave risk** . ### Ransomware-as-a-Service Dynamics Qilin's operational model reflects the broader trend of **professionalization in the ransomware ecosystem**. The group offers affiliates customizable malware, legal advisory services for negotiations, and dedicated media teams to shape public narratives and intensify psychological pressure on victims. This professionalization, combined with the exploitation of critical vulnerabilities, enables ransomware groups to execute precision attacks at scale . ## Regulatory and Legal Implications ### SEC Cybersecurity Disclosure Rules Inotiv's SEC filing aligns with **updated cybersecurity disclosure requirements**, mandating transparency about material incidents . The company's disclosure highlights the executive-level significance of ransomware incidents, which impact investor relations, regulatory compliance, and contractual obligations. ### Potential Compliance Penalties Depending on the nature of the stolen data, Inotiv could face penalties under **HIPAA** for protected health information (PHI) breaches, **GDPR** for data belonging to EU citizens, and **FDA regulations** for compromised clinical trial data . The company may also encounter lawsuits from affected clients or partners, amplifying financial and reputational costs. ## What Happens Next? ### Restoration and Monitoring Efforts. Inotiv continues to work with cybersecurity experts to restore affected systems and investigate the full scope of the breach . The company advised stakeholders to monitor for **phishing campaigns** leveraging stolen data and remain vigilant about suspicious account activity . ### Data Leakage Possibilities Given Qilin's history of leaking data from non-paying victims, it is likely that the stolen information could appear on **darknet forums** or be sold to other malicious actors . The publication of sample documents suggests that further leaks may follow if ransom demands are not met.

loading..   23-Aug-2025
loading..   6 min read