company logo

Product

Our Product

We are Reshaping the way Developers find and fix vulnerabilities before they get exploited.

Solutions

By Industry

BFSI

Healthcare

Education

IT & Telecom

Government

By Role

CISO

Application Security Engineer

DevsecOps Engineer

IT Manager

Resources

Resource Library

Get actionable insight straight from our threat Intel lab to keep you informed about the ever-changing Threat landscape.

Subscribe to Our Weekly Threat Digest

Company

Contact Us

Have queries, feedback or prospects? Get in touch and we shall be with you shortly.

loading..
loading..
loading..
Loading...

hacking

cyberthreat

loading..
loading..
loading..

North Korean Hackers

N Korean hackers may attack 20 lakh Indians with Covid-19 phishing emails, cyberthreats to follow

25-Jun-2020
2 min read

No content available.

Related Articles

loading..

Inotiv

Qilin

Pharmaceutical research company Inotiv faces operational disruptions and data th...

Inotiv, Inc., a prominent contract research organization specializing in drug discovery and development, fell victim to a sophisticated ransomware attack that encrypted critical systems and exfiltrated sensitive data. The **Qilin ransomware group** (also known as Agenda) claimed responsibility, alleging that they stole approximately 176 GB of data—equivalent to roughly 162,000 files—including financial records, research contracts, and employee information. The attack disrupted business operations, forcing the company to transition to offline alternatives while initiating forensic investigations and engaging law enforcement. This incident highlights the escalating threat that ransomware poses to the pharmaceutical and healthcare research sectors, where data sensitivity and operational continuity are of paramount importance. ## Background on Inotiv Inotiv is a **Indiana-based contract research organization** (CRO) employing around **2,000 specialists** and generating over **$500 million in annual revenue** . The company provides critical services in drug development, drug discovery, safety assessment, and live animal research modeling for pharmaceutical and biotechnology clients. Its work often involves **years-long nonclinical studies** and early-stage research, making data integrity and confidentiality essential not only for commercial success but also for regulatory compliance and public health advancements . As a key player in the pharmaceutical research ecosystem, Inotiv handles sensitive intellectual property, proprietary research data, and confidential client information, making it an attractive target for cybercriminals. ## Ransomware Attack ### Timeline and Initial Response Inotiv detected the cybersecurity incident on **August 8, 2025**, and immediately took steps to contain the breach. According to an **SEC 8-K filing** submitted by Chief Financial Officer Beth A. Taylor, the company launched an investigation with the help of external cybersecurity experts, restricted access to certain systems, and notified law enforcement authorities . The preliminary investigation revealed that a threat actor had gained unauthorized access to and encrypted portions of Inotiv's systems, temporarily impacting access to internal data storage and business applications. ### Operational Impact and Mitigation Strategies The encryption of systems led to significant **disruptions in business operations**, affecting databases and applications essential for daily processes. To mitigate the impact, Inotiv activated its business continuity strategy, transitioning some operations to offline alternatives. Despite these efforts, the company acknowledged that disruptions are expected to persist for some time, and no timeline for full restoration has been provided. The attack highlights the vulnerability of centralized data repositories in pharmaceutical research, where decades of valuable information can be compromised in a single breach. ## Qilin Connection ### Group Profile and Tactics The **Qilin ransomware gang**—a **Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS)** operation—publicly claimed responsibility for the attack on **August 11**, listing Inotiv on its leak site and publishing samples of the allegedly stolen data as proof . Qilin has evolved into a highly sophisticated threat group, leveraging customizable malware variants written in Rust and Go to target Windows, Linux, and VMware ESXi environments . Notably, Qilin systematically exploits critical vulnerabilities in **Fortinet products** (CVE-2024-21762 and CVE-2024-55591) to gain initial access, escalate privileges, and penetrate victim networks . In Q2 2025, Qilin accounted for **19% of ransomware incidents** impacting industrial organizations, reflecting its aggressive recruitment of skilled affiliates and alignment with state-sponsored threats . ### Extortion Demands Qilin alleges to have exfiltrated **176 GB of data**, including: - Financial records - Research contracts - Purchase orders - Employee information. This data theft aligns with the group's **double-extortion strategy**, where stolen data is leveraged to pressure victims into paying ransoms by threatening public leakage. The publication of sample documents on Qilin's leak site suggests the claims are credible, though Inotiv has not yet confirmed the extent of the data breach . ## Impact on Operations and Stakeholders ### Research and Development Delays The attack has **disrupted critical research activities**, potentially delaying ongoing drug development projects and nonclinical studies. For pharmaceutical research organizations like Inotiv, such disruptions can have **cascading effects** on client projects, regulatory submissions, and overall business continuity. The loss or compromise of long-term research data could necessitate years of redundant work, amplifying financial and operational costs. ### Regulatory and Compliance Exposure Inotiv may face **regulatory scrutiny** under HIPAA, GDPR, and FDA regulations, particularly if stolen data includes sensitive client or patient information. The company's SEC filing emphasizes that the full scope and impacts—including financial and operational consequences—remain under investigation. This incident also highlights the implications of the **SEC's new cybersecurity disclosure rules**, which require public companies to report material cyber incidents within four days . ### Reputational and Client Trust Risks The breach could erode trust among clients, partners, and investors, especially given the sensitive nature of pharmaceutical research. Inotiv has already faced unrelated enforcement actions earlier in 2025, and this cyber incident introduces **additional reputational risks** during a critical period. Clients may reconsider their reliance on centralized data storage models, opting for more segmented and secure architectures. ## Expert Commentary ### Industry Voices on ransomware Threats **Rebecca Moody, Head of Data Research at Comparitech**, notes that attacks on healthcare-related companies like Inotiv have **far-reaching consequences** due to their access to vast datasets across multiple entities . She confirmed that 19 similar attacks have occurred globally in 2025, resulting in over 6 million records breached. **Ensar Seker, Chief Information Security Officer at SOCRadar**, emphasized that the encryption of key systems and theft of proprietary research data places both **operational continuity and intellectual property at grave risk** . ### Ransomware-as-a-Service Dynamics Qilin's operational model reflects the broader trend of **professionalization in the ransomware ecosystem**. The group offers affiliates customizable malware, legal advisory services for negotiations, and dedicated media teams to shape public narratives and intensify psychological pressure on victims. This professionalization, combined with the exploitation of critical vulnerabilities, enables ransomware groups to execute precision attacks at scale . ## Regulatory and Legal Implications ### SEC Cybersecurity Disclosure Rules Inotiv's SEC filing aligns with **updated cybersecurity disclosure requirements**, mandating transparency about material incidents . The company's disclosure highlights the executive-level significance of ransomware incidents, which impact investor relations, regulatory compliance, and contractual obligations. ### Potential Compliance Penalties Depending on the nature of the stolen data, Inotiv could face penalties under **HIPAA** for protected health information (PHI) breaches, **GDPR** for data belonging to EU citizens, and **FDA regulations** for compromised clinical trial data . The company may also encounter lawsuits from affected clients or partners, amplifying financial and reputational costs. ## What Happens Next? ### Restoration and Monitoring Efforts. Inotiv continues to work with cybersecurity experts to restore affected systems and investigate the full scope of the breach . The company advised stakeholders to monitor for **phishing campaigns** leveraging stolen data and remain vigilant about suspicious account activity . ### Data Leakage Possibilities Given Qilin's history of leaking data from non-paying victims, it is likely that the stolen information could appear on **darknet forums** or be sold to other malicious actors . The publication of sample documents suggests that further leaks may follow if ransom demands are not met.

loading..   23-Aug-2025
loading..   6 min read
loading..

Interlock

DaVita ransomware breach exposes 2.7M patients via MOVEit supply chain attack. L...

In a stark illustration of healthcare’s third-party vulnerability, a ransomware attack exploiting the pervasive MOVEit Transfer vulnerability has compromised the protected health information (PHI) of nearly 2.7 million patients of DaVita Inc., a leading U.S. kidney care provider. The breach, originating not within DaVita's own infrastructure but at its communications vendor Welltok, Inc., underscores the systemic risk posed by software supply chains and the enduring threat from the Clop ransomware group’s 2023 campaign. #### **A Third-Party Conduit** DaVita, which operates a network of over 2,800 dialysis facilities and serves approximately 244,000 patients, was not directly compromised. Instead, the breach vector was its third-party service provider, **Welltok, Inc.**, which delivers patient engagement and communication software to numerous healthcare entities. The incident is a direct consequence of the mass-exploitation of zero-day vulnerabilities (CVE-2023-34362, CVE-2023-35036) in Progress Software’s MOVEit Transfer secure file-transfer tool in May 2023. Welltok utilized this platform, and its systems were breached during the wide-scale campaign orchestrated by the **Clop (aka Cl0p) ransomware gang**. The data pertaining to DaVita’s patients, exfiltrated during that event, has now been leveraged by a second threat actor, **RansomHub**, which is reportedly monetizing the previously stolen dataset. #### **MOVEit Legacy Monetization** The attack pathway demonstrates a classic software supply chain compromise: 1. **Initial Exploitation:** In May 2023, Clop actors systematically identified and attacked internet-facing MOVEit Transfer servers, including one belonging to Welltok, using a SQL injection vulnerability to gain unauthorized access. 2. **Data Exfiltration:** The threat actors harvested files containing sensitive data from Welltok’s system. Welltok served as a central data processor for its clients, meaning a single breach exposed data across its entire customer base. 3. **Secondary Data Sale:** Recent analysis indicates that the data stolen from Welltok, including the DaVita patient information, has been acquired or is being threatened by **RansomHub**. This group operates a ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS) model and frequently employs double-extortion tactics, encrypting data and threatening to publish it. In this case, they are likely pressuring victims by threatening to release the data originally stolen by Clop, highlighting an evolving trend of data "trading" or "resale" within the cybercriminal ecosystem. #### **A High-Value Payload** The exposed data constitutes a high-value payload for cybercriminals due to its comprehensiveness and sensitivity, which facilitates identity theft, targeted phishing (smishing/vishing), and insurance fraud. According to filings and notifications, the compromised information includes: * **Personally Identifiable Information (PII):** Full names, Social Security Numbers (SSNs), and contact information. * **Protected Health Information (PHI):** Health insurance details, medical diagnoses, procedures, and medications. The combination of SSNs and specific medical records creates a potent risk for affected individuals, as this information is perennial on dark web markets and is not easily changed, unlike a compromised credit card number. #### **A Delayed Disclosure** Welltok, as the data processor, began notifying affected organizations and individuals in **April 2024**, nearly a year after the initial intrusion. This delay is attributed to the complex process of identifying, categorizing, and validating the impacted data across its vast client portfolio. DaVita reported the breach to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) as required by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). The incident is listed on the HHS breach portal as impacting 2,700,000 individuals. In compliance with standard post-breach protocols, Welltok is offering affected individuals **24 months of complimentary credit monitoring and identity theft protection services** through CyEx. #### **A Systemic Healthcare Vulnerability** The DaVita/Welltok incident is not an outlier but a critical node in one of the most significant cyber campaigns in recent history. The MOVEit exploitation campaign has impacted over **2,700 organizations** and **90 million individuals** globally, spanning finance, energy, and most acutely, healthcare. This event reinforces three critical truths for the healthcare sector: 1. **The Attack Surface is Extrinsic:** An organization's security posture is only as strong as the weakest link in its vendor chain. Third-party risk management (TPRM) is no longer a compliance exercise but a core cybersecurity function. 2. **Legacy Vulnerabilities Have Long Tails:** A vulnerability patched nearly a year ago continues to yield victim notifications, demonstrating that the lifecycle of a breach extends far beyond initial remediation. 3. **Ransomware Economics are Evolving:** The involvement of RansomHub shows that exfiltrated data retains value and can be weaponized multiple times by different actors, creating a persistent threat long after the initial incident is closed. #### **Recommendations for Stakeholders** **For Affected Individuals: ** * Enroll in the offered credit monitoring services. * Place a fraud alert with major credit bureaus (Equifax, Experian, TransUnion) or initiate a full credit freeze. * Exercise extreme caution with unsolicited communications requesting personal or health information. * Scrutinize Explanation of Benefits (EOB) statements for fraudulent activity. **For Healthcare Organizations & Infosec Leadership:** * **Strengthen Third-Party Risk Management (TPRM):** Conduct rigorous, continuous security assessments of all vendors with access to PHI/PII, enforcing strict cybersecurity requirements in contracts, including patching SLAs. * **Adopt a Zero-Trust Architecture:** Assume breach and enforce strict identity and access management (IAM) policies, ensuring vendors have least-privilege access. * **Validate Incident Response Playbooks:** Ensure playbooks include specific procedures for third-party-originated incidents and conduct tabletop exercises that simulate supply chain attacks. * **Aggressively Patch Internet-Facing Systems:** This incident serves as another potent reminder of the critical importance of rapid patch deployment for all public-facing applications. The DaVita breach is a sobering testament to the interconnected and persistent nature of modern cyber threats. For the healthcare industry, where the protection of human well-being is directly linked to data security, building resilience requires a holistic strategy that looks far beyond organizational perimeter defenses. The future of healthcare cybersecurity depends on forging a resilient, transparent, and vigilant ecosystem that can weather the relentless evolution of the ransomware threat.

loading..   22-Aug-2025
loading..   5 min read
loading..

Telecommunication

1.3M Orange Belgium customers exposed. Hackers stole SIM data & PUK codes. The W...

On August 20, 2025, **Orange Belgium** disclosed a significant cyberattack impacting **850,000 customers**, approximately one-third of its subscriber base in Belgium and Luxembourg. The breach, detected in late July, exposed sensitive personal data including : - Full names and telephone numbers - SIM card serial numbers - Tariff plan details - **PUK (Personal Unblocking Key) codes**—critical for SIM card recovery Notably, the company confirmed that **passwords, email addresses, and financial data** were not compromised, as these are stored on separate, isolated systems. The breach primarily affected a customer management database, though operational services remained uninterrupted. ## **Attack Methodology and Threat Actor Analysis** ### **Exploited Vulnerabilities** The intrusion has been attributed to **Warlock**, an emerging ransomware gang exploiting a chain of SharePoint Server vulnerabilities known as **ToolShell**. These vulnerabilities, patched by Microsoft in July 2025, allow authentication bypass and remote code execution (RCE). Trend Micro researchers noted that Warlock used HTTP POST requests to upload webshells, followed by lateral movement using Group Policy abuse and credential theft. ### **Data Exfiltration & Extortion** Warlock claims to have exfiltrated data without encrypting systems—a trend increasingly common among ransomware groups focusing on extortion. Orange Belgium refused to pay a ransom, leading to the data being published on dark web leak sites. The group’s tactics mirror those of **[LockBit](https://www.secureblink.com/cyber-security-news/lock-bit-ransomware-s-claim-against-the-us-federal-reserve-hack) 3.0**, whose source code was leaked in 2023. ## **Orange’s Response and Criticisms** Orange Belgium’s incident response included: - Immediate isolation of affected systems and security hardening - Notification to regulatory authorities (Belgian Data Protection Authority) and judicial bodies - Customer alerts via SMS and email with recommendations for vigilance However, cybersecurity experts criticized the response: - **Inti De Ceukelaire** (Chief Hacker at Intigriti) accused Orange of downplaying risks like **SIM swapping** and number theft, relying on a "corporate PR playbook" rather than proactive measures. - Customers expressed frustration over the lack of tangible support (e.g., SIM card replacements) and emphasis on users self-managing risks. ## **Historical Context: Orange’s Cybersecurity Challenges** This incident is the third major cyberattack against Orange subsidiaries in 2025: | **Date** | **Target** | **Threat Actor** | **Impact** | **Source** | |----------------|------------------|------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------| | February 2025 | Orange Romania | HellCat/Rey | 6.5GB of employee data, partial payment cards, and 380,000 email addresses | | | July 2025 | [Orange Group](https://www.secureblink.com/cyber-security-news/orange-hacked-291-m-customers-at-risk-as-france-s-telecom-giant-collapses) (France) | Unidentified | Operational disruptions; no data confirmed stolen | | | July 2025 | Orange Belgium | Warlock | 850,000 customer records with SIM/PUK codes | | These incidents highlight **systemic vulnerabilities** in Orange’s infrastructure, including: - **Third-party access points** (e.g., partner portals in the Romania breach) - **Delayed patching** of critical software (e.g., SharePoint vulnerabilities) - **Inconsistent security protocols** across subsidiaries ## **Broader Telecom Sector Threats** The Orange Belgium breach occurred amid a global surge in telecom-targeted attacks: - **Telefónica Peru**: Breached by "Dedale" group, impacting 1 million customers. - **U.S. Carriers (Verizon, AT&T)**: Infiltrated by China-linked **Salt Typhoon** seeking wiretap information. - **Colt Technology Services**: Targeted by Warlock in parallel attacks, disrupting customer portals and APIs. Regulatory bodies like the **FCC** are tightening cybersecurity requirements for critical communications infrastructure, emphasizing **Zero Trust frameworks** and mandatory incident reporting.

loading..   21-Aug-2025
loading..   3 min read