company logo

Product

Our Product

We are Reshaping the way Developers find and fix vulnerabilities before they get exploited.

Solutions

By Industry

BFSI

Healthcare

Education

IT & Telecom

Government

By Role

CISO/CTO

DevOps Engineer

Resources

Resource Library

Get actionable insight straight from our threat Intel lab to keep you informed about the ever-changing Threat landscape.

Subscribe to Our Weekly Threat Digest

Company

Contact Us

Have queries, feedback or prospects? Get in touch and we shall be with you shortly.

loading..
loading..
loading..
Loading...

Data Breach

loading..
loading..
loading..

2.9 Million Sensitive Records of BSNL Users Reportedly COMPROMISED

Alleged BSNL data breach exposes 2.9 million sensitive records.

23-Dec-2023
4 min read

Related Articles

loading..

Finance

Data Breach

Banco Santander Data Breach: Is Your Information Safe? Learn what data was expos...

Banco Santander S.A., a global banking leader, recently disclosed a significant data breach. The breach resulted from unauthorized access to a database managed by a third-party service provider. This analysis delves into the incident, examining the technical specifics, implications, and the cybersecurity measures employed. #### Overview of Banco Santander Banco Santander operates in key markets, including Spain, the United Kingdom, Brazil, Mexico, and the United States. With over 140 million customers, its global footprint necessitates robust cybersecurity protocols. #### Incident Disclosure The breach, affecting customers and employees in Spain, Chile, and Uruguay, was acknowledged through a public statement. Banco Santander confirmed the compromise of a third-party hosted database. Although transaction information and online banking credentials were not affected, sensitive customer and employee data were accessed. #### Technical Breakdown of the Breach **Unauthorized Access:** The breach involved unauthorized access to a database hosted by a third-party provider. This indicates potential vulnerabilities in third-party vendor management and data security protocols. **Immediate Response:** Banco Santander took swift actions to contain the breach, blocking access to the compromised database. The bank also implemented additional fraud prevention controls. **Scope and Impact:** The exposed data pertained to customers in Spain, Chile, and Uruguay, along with current and former employees. The bank assured that systems and operations remained unaffected, and services continued without interruption. #### Technical Dissection **Third-Party Provider Vulnerability:** The breach underscores the critical risk posed by third-party service providers. Inadequate security measures at the provider’s end can lead to significant data breaches. Regular security audits, compliance checks, and robust contractual obligations are essential to mitigate these risks. **Database Security:** The incident highlights potential lapses in database security management. Secure database access controls, encryption at rest and in transit, and continuous monitoring are vital. A comprehensive database security strategy must include: - **Access Controls:** Implementing strict access controls and multi-factor authentication (MFA) to ensure only authorized personnel can access sensitive data. - **Encryption:** Encrypting data both at rest and in transit to protect it from unauthorized access. - **Monitoring:** Continuous monitoring for unusual activities and real-time alerts for potential breaches. **Fraud Prevention Controls:** Following the breach, Banco Santander enhanced its fraud prevention mechanisms. This likely involved the deployment of advanced anomaly detection systems and AI-driven analytics to identify and mitigate potential fraud attempts. #### Cybersecurity Standards and Practices **Incident Response Plan (IRP):** Banco Santander's swift response indicates an effective IRP. A robust IRP includes: - **Detection and Analysis:** Rapid identification of the breach and its scope. - **Containment and Eradication:** Immediate measures to contain the breach and eliminate the threat. - **Recovery:** Steps to restore systems and data integrity. - **Post-Incident Review:** Thorough review to understand the breach and improve defenses. **Vendor Risk Management:** Managing vendor risk involves: - **Due Diligence:** Rigorous assessment of vendors' security practices. - **Continuous Monitoring:** Regular audits and assessments of third-party security measures. - **Contractual Safeguards:** Strong contractual clauses ensuring vendors adhere to security standards. #### Code Snippets and Technical Examples **Database Access Controls Implementation:** Here’s a basic example of implementing database access controls using PostgreSQL: ```sql -- Create a new role CREATE ROLE readonly; -- Grant read-only access to the role GRANT CONNECT ON DATABASE santander_db TO readonly; GRANT USAGE ON SCHEMA public TO readonly; GRANT SELECT ON ALL TABLES IN SCHEMA public TO readonly; -- Assign the role to a user GRANT readonly TO user123; ``` **Encryption Example:** Using Python’s `cryptography` library to encrypt data before storing it in a database: ```python from cryptography.fernet import Fernet # Generate a key key = Fernet.generate_key() cipher_suite = Fernet(key) # Encrypt data data = b"Sensitive customer data" cipher_text = cipher_suite.encrypt(data) # Decrypt data plain_text = cipher_suite.decrypt(cipher_text) ``` **Monitoring Script Example:** A simple Python script using `psycopg2` to monitor unusual database activity: ```python import psycopg2 import logging # Configure logging logging.basicConfig(filename='db_activity.log', level=logging.INFO) def monitor_db_activity(): try: connection = psycopg2.connect(user="user", password="password", host="127.0.0.1", port="5432", database="santander_db") cursor = connection.cursor() # Execute a query to monitor activities cursor.execute("SELECT * FROM pg_stat_activity WHERE state = 'active'") records = cursor.fetchall() for record in records: logging.info(f"User: {record[1]}, Query: {record[7]}, Time: {record[10]}") except (Exception, psycopg2.Error) as error: logging.error(f"Error monitoring database activity: {error}") finally: if connection: cursor.close() connection.close() monitor_db_activity() ``` #### Conclusion The Banco Santander data breach highlights the importance of stringent cybersecurity measures, particularly regarding third-party service providers. Implementing robust database security, enhancing fraud prevention controls, and maintaining a proactive incident response plan are crucial. This incident serves as a reminder of the continuous vigilance required in safeguarding sensitive financial data in an interconnected digital ecosystem. ---

loading..   17-May-2024
loading..   4 min read
loading..

OTP

One-Time Codes Hacked? Hackers use social engineering to steal your codes & raid...

Cybercriminals are constantly devising sophisticated techniques to exploit weaknesses in online security systems. One such method involves SIM swap attacks, where attackers manipulate victims into divulging one-time passcodes (OTPs), enabling them to access sensitive accounts. #### Methodology Using a combination of social engineering tactics and technological prowess, cybercriminals orchestrate SIM swap attacks to compromise victims' accounts. The process typically begins with a fraudulent phone call or phishing email, designed to deceive victims into revealing one-time passcodes. #### Exploiting Human Vulnerabilities Cybercriminals leverage human psychology, exploiting victims' trust and ignorance to extract sensitive information. By posing as legitimate entities such as financial institutions, attackers manipulate victims into disclosing one-time passcodes under false pretenses. #### Role of Estate Estate, an interception operation, facilitates SIM swap attacks by automating fraudulent phone calls to deceive victims. Despite ostensibly offering security testing services, Estate operates in a legal gray area, enabling members to execute malicious cyberattacks. #### Technical Insights Estate's database provides valuable insights into the mechanics of SIM swap attacks. It reveals the intricate process of orchestrating fraudulent phone calls, targeting a wide range of services including banking institutions, cryptocurrency platforms, and social media accounts. #### Vulnerabilities in Security Protocols SIM swap attacks exploit weaknesses in security protocols, bypassing multi-factor authentication mechanisms. Despite efforts to safeguard accounts with one-time passcodes, cybercriminals adeptly circumvent these defenses, highlighting the need for enhanced security measures. #### Code Analysis Examination of Estate's attack scripts elucidates the technical intricacies of SIM swap attacks. These scripts contain tailored instructions for manipulating victims into divulging sensitive information, demonstrating the sophistication of cybercriminal tactics. #### Implications for Security The prevalence of SIM swap attacks underscores the evolving threat landscape faced by individuals and organizations. Unfortunately, there is no readily available statistic on how prevalent these attacks are. However, Gartner predicts that by 2022, 80% of security breaches will involve compromised legitimate credentials, highlighting the need for a more holistic approach to security beyond OTPs https://www.gartner.com/reviews/market/user-authentication. #### Countermeasures While SIM swap attacks pose a significant threat, there are steps you can take to protect yourself: **Be Wary of Unsolicited Calls or Emails:** Never give out personal information, especially one-time passcodes, over the phone or in response to emails requesting such information. Legitimate institutions will not ask for this information through these channels. **Enable Stronger Authentication Methods:** Consider using security keys or biometrics (fingerprint or facial recognition) for login in addition to one-time passcodes. These methods add an extra layer of security that is more difficult for attackers to bypass. **Be Mindful of SIM Swap Requests:** If you are contacted by your mobile carrier about a SIM swap request that you did not initiate, contact them immediately to report the suspicious activity. **Monitor Your Accounts Regularly:** Regularly review your bank statements and account activity for any unauthorized transactions. Early detection can help minimize the damage caused by a SIM swap attack. SIM swap attacks represent a significant cybersecurity risk, posing a threat to individuals' financial security and privacy.

loading..   15-May-2024
loading..   3 min read
loading..

Scraping

API

Dell suffers data breach! Fake partner exploits API flaw to steal 49 million cus...

The crux of the breach lies in Dell's partner portal API, designed for authorized resellers and partners to access customer order data. Menelik exploited a critical vulnerability within this API – a lack of stringent access controls and robust rate limiting mechanisms. Menelik established numerous accounts using fabricated company names. The registration process evidently lacked proper verification, granting immediate access upon submission. The vulnerable API allowed Menelik to develop a program that bombarded the system with requests, generating sequential service tags. This brute-force approach, unhindered by rate limiting, enabled the scraping of a staggering 49 million customer records. The following code snippet exemplifies a simple Python script that could potentially generate sequential service tags: `Python` `def generate_service_tags(start, end): for i in range(start, end + 1): yield f"DELL-{i:07d}"` `# Example usage for tag in generate_service_tags(1000000, 2000000): # Send API request to Dell portal with generated tag # Process response data (assuming successful response)` This is a hypothetical illustration, and the actual exploit might be even more sophisticated. Dell has not publicly disclosed the specifics of the vulnerability. #### Menelik's Claims and Dell's Response Menelik asserts that they contacted Dell security on two occasions, highlighting the API flaw. However, Dell contends they were already investigating the incident before receiving these emails. Dell's tight-lipped approach due to the ongoing investigation leaves unanswered questions regarding the specific timeframe of their awareness and the exact nature of their response prior to Menelik's communication. While Menelik's data harvesting is undoubtedly malicious, the delayed response from Dell raises concerns about their proactive security posture. #### API Security Threat Landscape This incident underscores the escalating risk posed by unsecured APIs. Easy accessibility and lax security measures make them prime targets for exploitation. The report cites similar breaches involving Facebook, Twitter, and Trello, all stemming from API vulnerabilities and inadequate rate limiting. Organizations must prioritize robust API security measures. Implementing stringent access controls, multi-factor authentication, and rigorous rate limiting are crucial safeguards.

loading..   14-May-2024
loading..   2 min read